Corporate Blogging & Leadership & The PR 2.0 Universe Melvin Yuan on 29 Mar 2007 12:05 pm
Being transparent doesn’t mean being stupid or sloppy
Clive Thompson of Wired wrote about the need for honesty and transparency in his article on “The See-Through CEO”. I agree with Greg that this is a pretty good piece, but I’m appalled by Clive’s sub-headline – “Fire the publicist. Go off message. Let all your employees blab and blog. In the new world of radical transparency, the path to business success is clear.”
In the interest of fellow PR professionals, I’d like to dissect it and examine the misconceptions embedded within:
- “Fire the publicist” – For too long, the term “Public Relations Professional” has been contracted to “Publicist”. This wrongly puts the focus on “Publicity” as the end-in-mind. The focus should be on “Relationships” instead. Publicity is mere “fruit” of the process, and a means to an end.
- “Go off message. Let all your employees blab and blog.” – “Messages” should explain the vision and actions of an organisation. A company that “goes off message” gives wrong and unclear impressions of the company’s vision and state of affairs. This is no good for everyone. Yes, we need to listen to the public, but after the listening is done, we have to make decisions; and our messages have to explain what the decisions are. Then we listen some more, participate in more conversations and adapt, innovate, and clearly state what we’re doing, where we are going. Leadership and clear directions are vital to the “conversation” process. I said it earlier at the end of my post on Leading Change, and I’ll say it again – the path (conversations with the public) ahead is a journey to lead, and not a walk in the dark.
- “Radical transparency” doesn’t mean “reduced accountability” (to the organization, shareholders and customers). If you prioritise blabber above action, you alarm the public and you waste their time. Yes, I’m all for “naked conversations” and “naked corporations”, but who wants a CEO to shift his businesses strategies from boardroom to bedroom? PR professionals are responsible for helping to pull that act together and make sure that CEOs listen and act in the best interest of the public and every stakeholder. CEOs and their companies must be human, personal and transparent. But Greg sums it up perfectly when he says that “being transparent doesn’t mean being stupid or sloppy.”
PR, Clive Thompsons-of-the-world, is far higher up the rungs of leadership than you perceive it to be. It is more about relationships than publicity, and more about leadership than relationships.
We PR folks get our priorities mixed up sometimes; but some of us are changing things.
And CEOs, this is not the time to “fire your publicists, go off message and let your employess blab and blog”. Even more than ever, you need the counsel of true PR professionals who understand that our chief mandate should not be “to create publicity”. We build the vital, trusted relationships that your companies depend on, and not the illusion of it.
“PR” is not a job title or “marketing strategy”. It is organisational leadership made public and personal. And today, we have the tools to do this better than ever.





on 30 Mar 2007 at 7:29 pm 1.GregPC said …
Melvin -
I meant to respond yesterday after I read your post but ran short of time. You make some really excellent points about the role and nature of communications. It’s been interesting for me to see the evolution in thinking among friends and colleagues as they come to realize that things have fundamentally change and that the role of PR isn’t just to get a story out but to craft a story in the context of the environment where it will be told, heard and retold by others.
GPC
on 31 Mar 2007 at 2:48 am 2.Melvin Yuan said …
Thanks Greg. And once again for penning the sentence that became the headline of this post.
on 01 Apr 2007 at 6:49 am 3.John Cass said …
Melvin,
I am not so sure that many public relations professionals were formerly in the business of creating trusted relationships with customers directly. Though certainly maybe indirectly. Rather I’d say that product builders, customer service people and the people who traditionally were the first contact with customers were responsible for creating trusted relationships. I think that rather public relations professionals can advise CEO’s and those employees on down about how to develop a good dialogue that recalls some of the key strengths of a company’s brand. Blogging is rather a team effort that borrows many skills from the public relations profession, but also much from other professions.
John
on 05 Apr 2007 at 2:32 am 4.Melvin Yuan said …
Hi John,
I completely agree that blogging is / should be a team effort. And what especially responates with me is your point on the need for PR counsel for product builders and employees who have direct contact with customers etc.
The dynamics of PR is drastically different today, and the role of corporate PR folks should change in accordance. This is a case I am trying to make in my next post.