Corporate Blogging & Leadership & The PR 2.0 Universe & The Social Web & Web Strategy Melvin Yuan on 05 Apr 2007 11:00 pm
The Concerted PR 2.0 Effort
In naming an agency effort that deals with the complexities of PR in our very wired world today, Ogilvy PR has nailed it with ‘360 Degree Digital Influence’. Few agencies can do better because “360 Degree Influence” is exactly the challenge that businesses face today in reaching out to the public and other stake-holders, and influencing them. (Well, almost the perfect name. I think ‘digital’ wrongly puts the spotlight on the technological aspect of the media revolution. It is primarily a sociological change, with technological second. But that’s another post altogether.)
The Case for 360 Degree (Digital) Influence
Corporations today are forcibly more transparent than before; with citizen journalists probing at every outlet, and with the power to draw public attention – for good or bad – vested on every employee from CEO to janitor.
Rohit Bhargava in his post on Corporate Bloggers and the Rise of the Accidental Spokesperson offers an insight into the complexities of PR today. He points out that individuals “working for an organization and blogging, but are not considered official spokespersons” can become ‘accidental spokespersons’; and he cites the example of Robert Scoble who became that very accidental spokesperson who humanized Microsoft to the rest of the world.
Similarly, outside corporate walls (and payrolls), there are customer evangelists who speak more for a company than the designated spokespersons or individuals from the corporate communications team itself. Mike Kaltschnee of HackingNetflix.com fame is one such example. So great is his influence on, and for, the online DVD rental service that Steve Rubel constantly talks about what Mike does for Netflix.
The Naked Corporation and its Many Public Faces
The point is – there are more faces to a company today than there were three years ago; and there are more public inquirers in the form of citizen journalists. The world is rife with ‘Accidental Spokespersons’ like Scoble, evangelists like Kaltschnee or unwitting newsmakers like the Comcast technician who fell asleep at a customer’s home while being put on hold by his own company’s customer service!
The Changing Role of PR Managers
In recent months, I’ve been thinking about the role of the PR manager amidst all these changes. The dynamics of PR has changed, but observably, the role of the PR manager hasn’t. And it should. With public spotlight on every inch of the company at all levels and in all departments, the PR manager has to stop focusing on mere publicity and media relations. He has to start influencing public relationships through every department and at every level of the company’s structure – orchestrating, in effect, a concerted PR effort.
The Concerted Effort
John Cass, in his response to my previous post on “Being transparent…”, accurately observed that “many public relations professionals were [not] formerly in the business of creating trusted relationships with customers directly, though certainly maybe indirectly.” He added that “product builders, customer service people and the people who traditionally were the first contact with customers were responsible for creating trusted relationships.”
Now, when you realize that customers (with the power to blog and to be heard online) ARE the Media as well, you can’t help but wonder about the need for PR counsel in Customer Relations, and the many other functions within the corporation.
Why PR Has to Lead
Because PR professionals have the skill-set to deal with the intricacies of public relations and corporate reputation, the PR manager/director must take the leadership reins in preparing the company to deal with the ‘360 degree’ landscape of digital influence.
John Cass observes that “blogging is a team effort that borrows many skills from the public relations profession, [and] also much from other professions.” And that is true. This is why PR must be considered in every aspect of the business; for counsel on the impact of every business function on public relations.
Clearly, PR (in the true sense of the word) is no longer the sole responsibility of the PR team, or designated spokespersons. The reputation of a company and the relationship it has with the public lies in the hands of many.
And the PR manager must lead this concerted effort with an effective strategy – energizing employees to be effective spokespersons, engaging customer evangelists and integrating them into the media and marketing strategy, holding customer service accountable to stringent demands that corporate reputation is built upon etc.
Earning Our Place in the C-suite
Along with this responsibility comes PR’s opportunity to prove our place in the C-suite.
It begins when CEOs recognize that corporate walls have vanished and that the company – like it or not – is made more transparent than ever. And there is a need for effective counsel in the C-suite, because in the ‘transparent organization’ phenomenon lies both danger and opportunity:
Danger, for the company that does not have its house in order. And opportunity, for strong companies to bring vital relationships with the public to a much deeper level.
The way to do it?
Before developing strategy at the C-levels, corporate PR managers must first earn that trust and equip themselves by understanding how every department in the company operates and its intrinsic relationship with the public. When they do, they will see their (transparent) company as it truly is. And this understanding will enable them to forge relationships with the public that views the company, not through the windows of the CEO office or the communications department, but through every pore. Only then, can Influence be truly 360.
Updates:
John Bell and Walter Lim have made two comments that are worth expanding here
PR’s Catapult into the C-suite – Direct Impact on the Bottom-line
John Bell affirms that today, we have an increasingly important place in the boardroom because social media has greater impact on stock prices than before; and “traditional marketing is going in only one direction”.
We need no more evidence than corporate crises like the Kryptonite lock case, or the numerous research papers that forecast higher online expenditure. The imperative is now on CEOs to bring PR into a calm boardroom with a solid game plan; rather than yank them in later with the panic button.
Everyone thinks 360 anyway. It’s time we do too!
Walter Lim points out that another motivation to think 360-degrees – is simply because everyone else does! Even if ‘traditional PR folks’ don’t think so, journalists are even more aware today, of a company’s many public faces. This means that more reporters will want to talk to bloggers with a point of view on customer service, and interview the shop-floor operators who sit 10,000 cubicles away from the HR directors.
If there ever was a motivation for those holed up in ‘traditional media’ to embrace the mandate to think 360-degrees, this is it!
Natural Progression
And a final point – natural progression. The world is clearly moving towards greater social public disclosure. Financial standards, food and drug labeling and manufacturing data, amongst many other aspects, have to abide by stricter standards of social disclosure than before.
Sure, we could wait for a global public disaster the likes of Enron, before bringing PR higher up the management agenda, or we could be proactive in creating constructive transparent relationships at all levels of the business.
It’s your call.





on 08 Apr 2007 at 11:38 am 1.PR Communications said …
Public Relations At 360 Degrees …
Melvin Yuan writes a lucid and interesting post on the changing nature of public relations, suggesting that “the PR manager/director must take the leadership reins in preparing the company to deal with ‘360 degree’ landscape of digital influence.” …
on 08 Apr 2007 at 11:17 pm 2.John Bell said …
I appreciate the ’shout out’ although I know you were using our name to make a point. I also agree that the “digital” in 360° Digital Influence is misleading as we are focused on word of mouth and the implied relationships driving that online or offline.
In as much as PR pros embrace this new, open and transparent approach to influencing people in a positive way, we deserve a seat in the C-suite. I remember hearing Harold Burson share his stories of counseling CEOs. That role went away with the addition of Comms pros inside the corporation. Then I think they all got marginalized.
We have a new opportunity to offer much needed counsel when social media affects stock price and when the effectiveness of traditional marketing is going in only one direction
on 09 Apr 2007 at 12:00 am 3.Walter said …
Nice piece there on the new world of Influence 2.0 or how the work of PR practitioners will change in future. In fact, if you do speak to any self respecting journalist or editor, the last person that they want to get a quote from is the spokesperson (which yours truly happen to be). They want to get to where the real action is - the operators, the practitioners and the experts in their field - and not just speak to a paid suit who will always spout the most politically correct spiel! Every single employee needs to be prepared to be an ambassador and advocate in the new world of PR, and it would be interesting to see how the giants in the organisational world - MNCs, GLCs and even *gasp* public sector organisations - adapt to this new paradigm.
on 09 Apr 2007 at 3:55 pm 4.Melvin Yuan said …
John (Cass),
Thank you for your post. It’s deeply encouraging to hear you agree that PR professionals must be given a place beyond traditional organization boundaries of influence.
John (Bell),
Yes, I used the name to illustrate a point, but kudos to you and Ogilvy PR for inventing and adopting it. It’s a brilliant name, and it says more about the (potential) value of PR than many essays.
I suspect we face the same challenges here On one hand, we want to be accurate with the PR terms we use (or avoid). On the other hand, the common terms – like “Digital†or “New Media vs Traditional Mainstream Media†– have traces of inaccuracy in them (such as this). It’s a chore to keep going against the grain of common thinking and language. But I think it’s most important to challenge common (but fundamentally wrong) perceptives. When the paradigm is correct, the right thinking actions results will follow.
Walter,
Thanks. And good point about the relevance to reporters. It’s a useful and important reminder; and I’ve included that point as an update to my main post.
on 10 Apr 2007 at 10:17 pm 5.GregPC said …
Melvin - you’ve done a masterful job laying out the case for 360-degrees and the role of PR. I have to give what you’ve written - and the associated comments and sources - some thought. Influences seems like such a one-way street that I wonder if it is the right term for what we’re trying to accomplish. I’ll need to post something soon.
GPC
on 12 Apr 2007 at 12:18 am 6.Melvin Yuan said …
Thanks Greg.
I can’t wait to read your coming post; and look forward to the conversation after.
Melvin
on 31 Dec 2007 at 10:45 am 7.» To: Customer Service Manager. cc: CEO; PR Dept. said …
[…] an earlier post this year, I proposed that PR managers should be responsible for orchestrating the concerted PR effort – […]