<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rewriting rewritten rules – Uncovering Social Media truths</title>
	<link>http://thepr2.0universe.com/2007/12/14/rewriting-rewritten-rules-%e2%80%93-uncovering-social-media-truths/</link>
	<description>Mapping the PR 2.0 Universe</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Cass</title>
		<link>http://thepr2.0universe.com/2007/12/14/rewriting-rewritten-rules-%e2%80%93-uncovering-social-media-truths/#comment-11110</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thepr2.0universe.com/2007/12/14/rewriting-rewritten-rules-%e2%80%93-uncovering-social-media-truths/#comment-11110</guid>
		<description>You might almost be suggesting democracies don't work. I think the consensus opinion might not always be the best result but it's the one that results in the least conflict. I personally would agree that many times a decision might not be the best result but I do think it is what is realistic within a community. Though in this case I do have some disagreements with Chip on his ideas for social media against the community. Thanks this is an interesting discussion; I might revisit my second article and include our discussion.

Cheers for the words of praise for the elephant article.

Happy New Year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might almost be suggesting democracies don&#8217;t work. I think the consensus opinion might not always be the best result but it&#8217;s the one that results in the least conflict. I personally would agree that many times a decision might not be the best result but I do think it is what is realistic within a community. Though in this case I do have some disagreements with Chip on his ideas for social media against the community. Thanks this is an interesting discussion; I might revisit my second article and include our discussion.</p>
<p>Cheers for the words of praise for the elephant article.</p>
<p>Happy New Year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melvin Yuan</title>
		<link>http://thepr2.0universe.com/2007/12/14/rewriting-rewritten-rules-%e2%80%93-uncovering-social-media-truths/#comment-10219</link>
		<dc:creator>Melvin Yuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 01:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thepr2.0universe.com/2007/12/14/rewriting-rewritten-rules-%e2%80%93-uncovering-social-media-truths/#comment-10219</guid>
		<description>Indeed. A community often does police itself... and usually pretty well. I only worry when we overestimate the ability of a community to make the right decision. History leaves us many examples of grave mistakes made by consensus.

Thanks for the link to your article. It's good and I enjoyed it.

Merry Christmas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. A community often does police itself&#8230; and usually pretty well. I only worry when we overestimate the ability of a community to make the right decision. History leaves us many examples of grave mistakes made by consensus.</p>
<p>Thanks for the link to your article. It&#8217;s good and I enjoyed it.</p>
<p>Merry Christmas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cass</title>
		<link>http://thepr2.0universe.com/2007/12/14/rewriting-rewritten-rules-%e2%80%93-uncovering-social-media-truths/#comment-10196</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 18:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thepr2.0universe.com/2007/12/14/rewriting-rewritten-rules-%e2%80%93-uncovering-social-media-truths/#comment-10196</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for the mention. The whole debate has been interesting. I was reading a Boston Globe article today on copyright issues, and how several scholars are suggesting that many professions don't need tougher copyright legal protection because a community will police itself. The article gives the example of magicians, and comics. I thought that was interesting. Chip might be right on a number of things, but sometimes the community determines what is right and wrong.

I wrote a post about the elephant story a while ago. Unrelated, but I thought you might be interested.
http://www.newcommreview.com/?p=164</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for the mention. The whole debate has been interesting. I was reading a Boston Globe article today on copyright issues, and how several scholars are suggesting that many professions don&#8217;t need tougher copyright legal protection because a community will police itself. The article gives the example of magicians, and comics. I thought that was interesting. Chip might be right on a number of things, but sometimes the community determines what is right and wrong.</p>
<p>I wrote a post about the elephant story a while ago. Unrelated, but I thought you might be interested.<br />
<a href="http://www.newcommreview.com/?p=164" rel="nofollow">http://www.newcommreview.com/?p=164</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
